My example of a Continuous Photo.
E Muybridge's 'Placing Chair'.
The main differences between Muybridge's work and mine are that my images are in colour whereas his images have a black and white or 'Sepia' tone to them because they were taken in the 19th Century when colour photography hadn't yet been invented. It would have been produced on black and white film whereas my images have been taken and edited digitally.
I also have produced less images in the sequence than Muybridge as I have 8 and he has 24 which, in my opinion, is better as he has managed to capture small movements whereas mine have gaps and are fairly jumpy where the picture wasn't taken fast enough. My images are also a lot bigger in size than the ones in Muybridge's sequence as he has more of them to put on to the page whereas i have a smaller number so they can take up a larger space on the sheet.
Although my images and Muybridge's have the same theme in it by using people, the composition of them both are very different as my images were taken outside with bright lighting whereas Muybridge's have been taken inside with fairly dark lighting in comparison.
Our images have similar qualities in that they are both a sequence of images that are continuous and follow on one after the other which shows the movement of an object or subject matter. Also, our images have been manipulated in to a sequence together so as they have fluid movement and show clearly that the images are meant to be together in a sequence.
We both also use the same subject of a person that is completely in all of the pictures even though they are different styles due to the year gap between where technology has advanced.
Both images also gives out the same message of movement of a person which is portrayed in both sequences and this shows how that even though we have progressed 2 centuries, that photography techniques are still very similar as well as composition and styles.